THE LOCAL CHURCH DEFINED
Down
through the years, there has been considerable disagreement as to what
constitutes a New Testament church. The usual approach is to list a
certain number of requirements or marks; if a group of Christians
answers to these qualifications, then it is considered to be a true
local church.
Henry
Barrow has given what might be considered a rather typical definition
of a church. He defined it as follows: “A true-planted and
rightly-established church of Christ is a company of faithful people,
separated from unbelievers, gathered in the Name of Christ, whom they
truly worship and readily obey. They are a brotherhood, a communion of
saints, each one of them standing in and for their Christian liberty to
practice whatsoever God ha commanded and revealed unto them in His Holy
Word.”
First Corinthians 1:2
gives a simple, yet accurate description of a local church. “To them
that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, and called to be saints, with all
that in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both
their Lord and ours.”
Other
definitions have been far more restricted with the result that only the
churches of a certain denomination or group actually qualify.
THE NEW TESTAMENT APPROACH
This
raises a very real question. Does the New Testament list a certain
number of requisites or essentials of a local church? Are the marks of
an assembly stated so clearly that any believer could separate the
fellowships in any area into those which ate true New Testament churches
and those which are not?
We
would suggest that this is not the case. If becoming a true church were
merely a matter of conforming to a certain pattern or going through a
specified routine of meetings, then this could be done quite
mechanically without spiritual exercise. Lethargy and complacency would
result. Though the position of a church might be ever so correct, yet
the condition of the believers might be far otherwise.
Instead
of that, we believe that the New Testament approach is this. All
believers are instructed that, by the grace of God, they are members of
the Church. They are exhorted to gather together in such a way as to
give expression to the great truths of the Church. Some assemblies of Christians give a very poor representation of the body of Christ. Other groups present a more faithful likeness. None does so perfectly.
Thus,
instead of following the legalistic method which says, ‘lf you meet
certain requirements, you will become a church,’ the language of
Scripture is the language of grace; namely, “You as believers are the
Church; now meet in such a manner as to give an accurate expression of
this fact to the world.” The motive power under grace is love for the
Savior, and this love should make us want to present a faithful image of
the body of Christ to those around us.
A BRIEF SUMMARY - THE LOCAL CHURCH
To
summarize then, the local church should be a miniature of the Church
universal. It should be nothing and do nothing that would contradict the
great truths of the Church which is the body of Christ.
As
Ridout has said: “Its nature and unity must be manifested. It must be
seen that it is the body of Christ, formed by and indwelt by the Holy
Spirit, that all believers are members of it, united to Christ glorified
and to one another; that the Lord’s coming is the hope before it; and
that the Name of Christ is the only one by which it is called.
Furthermore, it must exhibit the unity of the body of Christ.”
If
then, the local church must be a replica of the complete Church, what
are the great truths of the body of Christ to which it must provide a
living testimony? We have already referred to seven of these fundamental
truths; namely:
A. There is one body.
B. Christ is Head of the body.
C. All believers are members of the body.
D. The Holy Spirit is the representative of Christ in the Church.
E. The Church of God is holy.
E. Gifts are given for the edification of the Church.
G. All believers are priests of God.
Our
present objective, therefore, is to take these truths one by one, and
seek to determine how the local church can portray them to the world.
THE TRUTH OF THE ONE BODY
The
first truth to which the local church is responsible to witness is that
there is one body. How can believers testify to this fact today?
1. WHAT NAME SHOULD BE TAKEN
Perhaps the most obvious way is by adopting no names that
would separate them from other Christians. In the church of Corinth,
some were saying, “I am of Paul,” “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of
Christ.” Paul indignantly condemns such a spirit by asking, “Is Christ
divided?’ (1 Corinthians 1:10-17).
Today
Christians divide themselves into denominations named after countries,
religious leaders, ordinances, or forms of church government. All such
are a practical denial of the unity of the body of Christ.
Clearly,
the scriptural approach is for God’s children to be known only by such
names as are given in the Bible – names such as “believers’’ (Acts 5:14); “disciples” (Acts 9:1); “Christians” (Acts 11:26); “saints” (Ephesians 1:1); and “brethren,” (James 2:1).
It is perhaps one of the most difficult tasks in the Christian life to
carry no name but that of a simple believer. The vast majority today
feels that one must belong to some organized church and carry some other
name than those given in the Word. Anyone
who refuses to be known as anything but a child of God will suffer
reproach at the hands even of other Christians and will always be a
conundrum in the community. Yet how can believers consistently do
otherwise?
But
obviously it is not enough just to have a scripturally accurate name.
It is all too possible to adhere strictly to the language of the Bible
and yet be extremely sectarian in spirit. Some in Corinth were saying,
“I am of Christ,” for instance. Perhaps they prided themselves on the
correctness of their name, but they actually meant that they were of
Christ to the exclusion of other true believers. Paul found fault with
them equally as much as with those who claimed loyalty to himself or
Apollos.
2. WHAT ABOUT THE DENOMINATIONS?
When
any doubt is voiced as to the scripturalness of denominations, the
objection is commonly raised that the Lord has richly blessed in some of
the great divisions and sects of the Church. Granting that this is
true, we should still remember that the blessing of the Lord does not
indicate divine approval in every detail. He honors His own Word though
often its delivery is accompanied by much failure and imperfection. If
God blessed only where there was perfection, there would be no blessing.
Therefore the fact that any group has seen His hand does not mean that
He approves of all that the group does. The message is always greater
than the messenger.
The Lord’s attitude toward divisions in the Church is clearly shown in 1 Corinthians 3:4: ‘For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?’
Divisions
in the Church bring great evils. They create artificial barriers to
fellowship. They limit the movement of gifted men of God whose ministry
should be available to all the Church. They confuse the world, causing
men to ask, “Which church is right?”
In his renowned work, The Lord’s Prayer for Believers, Marcus Rainsford wrote:
“For my own part, I believe sects and denominations to be the result of
the devil’s attempt to mar and hinder as far as possible the visible
union of the Church of God; and that they all have their root in our
spiritual pride and selfishness, our self-sufficiency and our sin.’
“May
God forgive us for, and correct our divisions! Nothing gives greater
occasion to the outside world, than the differences between professing
Christians. The bickerings and contentions between men and women of
different sects and denominations of the visible Church of God has
always been one of the world’s greatest hindrances. Instead of looking
on, and being constrained to confess, See how these Christians love one
another,’ the world has too often reason to say, ‘See how they carp at
one another, see how they judge one another, see how they malign one
another.’
Sadly,
this deplorable state exists all too often within some local churches
and dishonor is thereby brought upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
3. TRUE UNITY
Believers
who determine to witness to the unity of the body of Christ will find
it a great difficulty to separate themselves from all divisions in the
Church, and at the same time maintain a loving spirit toward all the
people of God.
C. H. Mackintosh, beloved author of the Notes on the Pentateuch, wrote: “The
grand difficulty is to combine a spirit of intense separation with a
spirit of grace, gentleness and forbearance; or, as another has said,
‘to maintain a narrow circle with a wide heart.’ This is really a
difficulty. As the strict and uncompromising maintenance of truth tends
to narrow the circle around us, we all shall need the expansive power of
grace to keep the heart wide and the affections warm. If we contend for
truth otherwise than in grace, we shall only yield a one-sided and most
unattractive testimony. And on the other hand, if we try to exhibit
grace at the expense of truth, it will prove, in the end, to be only the
manifestation of a popular liberty at God’s expenses most worthless
thing.”’
W.
H. Griffith Thomas expressed the same thought in his book, Ministerial
Life and Work: “Let the principles be firmly fixed on the unmistakable
rock of Divine truth, but let the sympathies go out as widely as
possible to all who are endeavoring to live and labor for Christ. Never
shall I forget the words of the saintly and noble Bishop Whipple of
Minnesota, the Apostle of the Indians, as I heard them in London on a
memorable occasion: ‘For thirty years I have tried to see the face of
Christ in those who have differed from me.’
The
visible display of the unity of the body of Christ is not to be brought
about by the various ecumenical movements about which so much is heard
today. Such unions, councils or federations succeed only by compromising
the great truths of the Scripture. Christian congregations deny their
Lord when they join with those who repudiate the virgin birth of Christ,
His sinless humanity, His substitutionary death, His bodily
resurrection, His ascension and exaltation, and His coming again.
The
true basis of Christian unity is a common devotion to Christ and His
Word. When His glory is the great desire of our hearts, then we will be
drawn together, and then His prayer will be answered: “That they may be
one, even as we are one,” (John 17:22).
As Griffith Thomas has said, “It has often been pointed out that when
the tide is out, there are little pools of water here and there on the
shore, separated from each other by vast stretches of sand, and it is
only when the great tide rolls in and submerges them all in its vast
embrace that they become one and are united. So must it be, so will it
be with our severances of heart, ‘our unhappy divisions’; the great tide
of God’s love will flow deeper and fuller into each and all of our
lives, and in the ocean of that love we realize the Divine ideal of
love, joy, peace for evermore.”’
In
the meantime the responsibility of local churches is to seek to
maintain a testimony to the unity of the body of Christ in a day when
most of Christendom serves only to deny the fact. They can do this by
acknowledging in spirit, principle and practice all their
fellow-believers.
Index CĂRŢI
